Dwyer, who “ranks among a tiny cadre of the city’s super criminal defense lawyers,” brings decades of legal acumen to the table with a “focused perseverance and legal savvy [that] have become the stuff of near legend.”
– The Boston Globe
Background Facts
The appellant was charged with extortion for making a deal to drop charges against two individuals charged with prostitution in exchange for a payment of $4,000 to a charity run by the police department (and from which the appellant paid personal expenses). When the police first raided the inn, one of the individuals admitted to the prostitution and offered to donate the proceeds to charity in order to avoid the charges. The police initially refused the offer. However, when the appellant became involved, he decided that he would accept payment to clear the individuals.
To secure the deal, the appellant presented an “Accord & Satisfaction” to the two individuals at a scheduled court appearance. The two individuals signed the document, paid the $4,000 to the charity, and the appellant dropped the charges.
The clerk-magistrate assigned to the matter questioned the decision to drop the charges, and the district attorney’s office agreed, asking the Massachusetts State Police to investigate. After the investigation, a grand jury indicted the appellant for several charges, including Hobbs Act extortion under color of official right. At trial, the appellant was acquitted of all charges except Hobbs Act extortion under color of official right. He appealed.