Question

A failure to rescue

Asked 5 July 2010 · 2 answers

The question

My 24 yr old daughter who most likely had PTSD from a molest as a child and her fiance hanging himself over an argument with her on the phone had 2 severe anxiety attacks in one day. That was very uncommon for her. I took her to the emergency room to see a doctor. the same hospital she had been in for an attempted suicide 3 years earlier and the doctor listened to me tell her story as she sat crying he asked her 3 questions one whats going on two do u feel like hurting urself and 3 do u like colozapram she said no then he said how about xanax she said yes. She said she had not had any in months but he still gave her 30 1 mil. The same day 18 hrs later i found her hanging in her closetafter taking the xanax. I looked everywhere but could not find an attorney to take this case even tho my friends friend who is a lawyer for a hospital said if he only spent 10 min with her its a failure to rescue. Someone please tell me its true and how to find a lawyer

From the LawyerCentral forum archive. Originally posted 5 July 2010 on a legal forum that has closed. Names and contact details were removed. See the original (Internet Archive).

2 answers

Visitor answer 18 October 2010

First, let me just say how truly sorry I am. I hope

your heart has begun to heal a little bit at this

point.

About your post: I’m not a lawyer, but I know that

prescribing Xanax in particular has been the subject of

some controversy and lawsuits concerning patients

committing suicide. I would consult a medical

malpractice lawyer and see if he or she can review your

case. Do it as quickly as possible, since there is

often a statue of limitations on these things.

Again, I am sorry for your loss.

Visitor answer 9 September 2011

Physicians in most states have the authority to

involuntarily commit a patient to the hospital if they

are deemed a danger to self or others. It's a

responsibility that most take seriously. Depriving

someone of his or her right to leave freely and

confining them against their will is a big deal. If

we are to confine someone against their will and

essentially violate their rights, there ought to be a

VERY good reason. In your daughter's case, she denied

any intention of harming herself. As such, she should

have been free to go. It's a tragedy that she killed

herself, but we can't be expected to predict the

future. We can only operate on the information we're

provided.

Sorry for your loss.

Add your answer

Answers are reviewed before they appear. They are general information from visitors, not legal advice, and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. Do not include private details.

Need a lawyer for this?

See attorneys near you who handle questions like this one.

Ask a lawyer

← All questions